Orlando is one of the most visited cities in the world. The International Drive resort corridor, the theme park complexes of Walt Disney World, Universal Orlando, and SeaWorld, the convention center district, and the apartment complexes of the greater Orlando metropolitan area all attract tens of millions of visitors and residents each year. This concentration of people — many of them tourists unfamiliar with the area — creates significant security obligations for property owners.

When a property owner or manager fails to provide adequate security — and a guest, tenant, or visitor is shot, robbed, or assaulted as a result — Florida's negligent security law provides a path to compensation. At Juan Cordero Lawyers, we represent Orlando and Orange County victims of violent crime in negligent security cases against hotels, apartment complexes, entertainment venues, and other property owners.

Negligent security is a form of premises liability. Under Florida law, property owners and managers owe a duty of reasonable care to people who enter their property. When the property is located in an area with a known history of criminal activity, that duty includes taking reasonable steps to prevent foreseeable criminal acts.

Foreseeability is the central concept in negligent security law. A property owner is not an insurer against all crime. But when prior incidents of crime on or near the property put the owner on notice that violent crime is a foreseeable risk, the owner has a duty to take reasonable security measures. Failure to do so — and a subsequent violent crime that causes injury or death — gives rise to a negligent security claim.

Dark parking lots, stairwells, and common areas are among the most common security failures in Orlando negligent security cases. Inadequate lighting creates concealment opportunities for criminals and reduces the deterrent effect of security measures.

Hotels, entertainment venues, apartment complexes, and commercial properties in high-crime areas of Orlando often require security guards to meet the standard of reasonable care. The absence of security personnel — or the presence of untrained, unarmed, or inadequately supervised guards — can constitute negligent security.

Broken door locks, malfunctioning key card systems, propped-open security doors, and broken perimeter fencing allow unauthorized individuals to access areas where guests, tenants, and visitors have a reasonable expectation of safety.

Security cameras serve both a deterrent function and an investigative function. In high-crime areas, the absence of functioning surveillance cameras — or the failure to maintain and monitor existing cameras — can constitute negligent security.

The International Drive (I-Drive) corridor is one of the highest-density tourist environments in the United States. The concentration of hotels, restaurants, entertainment venues, and retail properties along I-Drive creates significant security obligations. Hotels in this area have a heightened duty to provide adequate security, including trained security personnel, functioning surveillance systems, and controlled access to restricted areas.

Prior incidents of crime on I-Drive properties — documented in Orange County Sheriff's Office reports and hotel incident logs — are critical evidence in negligent security cases. Property owners who are aware of prior criminal incidents and fail to take corrective action face significant liability exposure.

The major theme park complexes — Walt Disney World, Universal Orlando, and SeaWorld — are operated by large corporate defendants with sophisticated security operations. Negligent security claims against these defendants require evidence that the specific security failure was a departure from the standard of care for a property of that type and size.

Disney, Universal, and SeaWorld are private companies not subject to Florida's sovereign immunity statute. However, their size and resources mean that litigation against these defendants is complex and requires experienced legal representation.

The Kissimmee and Davenport areas of Osceola County have a large concentration of vacation rental properties — single-family homes and townhomes rented through platforms like Airbnb and VRBO. Negligent security claims in the vacation rental context can involve multiple defendants: the homeowner, the property management company, and the rental platform.

Apartment complexes in the Pine Hills, Mercy Drive, and other Orlando neighborhoods with elevated crime rates have a heightened duty to provide adequate security for their tenants. Common failures include broken perimeter fencing, malfunctioning entry systems, inadequate lighting, and absence of security personnel.

The area surrounding the Orange County Convention Center — including the hotels and commercial properties along International Drive and Sand Lake Road — attracts large numbers of convention attendees and tourists. Property owners in this area have a duty to provide adequate security during high-traffic periods.

Florida courts have recognized Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles as relevant to the standard of care in negligent security cases. CPTED evaluates whether the property's design — lighting, sight lines, fencing, landscaping, signage — deterred or facilitated the criminal act. Expert witnesses in negligent security cases often evaluate CPTED compliance as part of the liability analysis.

Under Florida law, a property owner's duty to provide security is triggered by foreseeability — whether the specific type of crime that occurred was foreseeable based on the prior criminal history of the property and the surrounding area. Evidence of prior similar incidents on the property is the most powerful evidence of foreseeability.

Florida's modified comparative fault rule (§768.81, Fla. Stat.), as amended by the 2023 tort reform (HB 837), bars recovery if the plaintiff is found to be more than 50% at fault. An experienced negligent security attorney can counter comparative fault arguments with evidence of the property owner's superior knowledge of the crime risk.

Under the 2023 tort reform (HB 837), the general personal injury statute of limitations in Florida was reduced from four years to two years from the date of the incident. This applies to negligent security claims. Do not delay — contact an attorney as soon as possible after a violent crime injury.

When a violent crime results in death, Florida's Wrongful Death Act (§768.16–768.26, Fla. Stat.) provides a separate cause of action. Recoverable damages include the mental pain and suffering of surviving family members.

Recoverable damages in negligent security cases include:

• Medical expenses — emergency care, surgeries, hospitalization, rehabilitation
• Lost wages and earning capacity — income lost during recovery and future earning capacity
• Pain and suffering — physical pain and emotional distress
• Mental anguish and PTSD — the psychological impact of surviving a violent crime
• Permanent scarring and disfigurement
• Loss of enjoyment of life
• Wrongful death damages — mental pain and suffering of surviving family members

Juan Cordero Lawyers represents Orlando and Orange County victims of violent crime in negligent security cases on a contingency fee basis — you pay nothing unless we win.

If you or a family member was shot, robbed, or assaulted at an Orlando hotel, apartment complex, entertainment venue, or other property, call 305-525-8957 for a free consultation.

• What Is Negligent Security in Florida?
• Florida Negligent Security Lawyer
• Orlando Apartment Shooting — Negligent Security
• Florida Hotel and Motel Shooting Liability
• Florida Wrongful Death Law
• Our Verdicts and Settlements
• Florida Statutes of Limitations for Injury Claims

• Orlando Slip and Fall Lawyer
• Orlando Medical Malpractice & HIE Lawyer
• Orlando Pool Drowning Lawyer
• Orlando Semi Truck Accident Lawyer
• Orlando Birth Injury Lawyer